Best Restaurant POS Systems in Asia (2026)
Asia's restaurant technology landscape is evolving rapidly. With the rise of delivery aggregators like Grab, Gojek, and Uber Eats, plus mobile payment adoption sweeping through Southeast Asia and Japan, choosing the right POS system has never been more critical.
In this guide, we compare the top restaurant POS systems in Asia — examining features, pricing, regional support, and which businesses each solution best serves.
Why Restaurant POS Selection Matters in Asia
Running a restaurant in Asia means dealing with unique challenges:
- Multi-platform delivery integration — Grab, Gojek, Foodpanda, Uber Eats, and local players all require separate integrations
- Payment diversity — Cash, QR codes (QRIS, PayNow, Fast), e-wallets, and card payments must all work seamlessly
- Multi-location complexity — Managing outlets across different countries with different regulations
- Commission pressure — Delivery fees of 15-30% eat into margins
The right POS system consolidates these pain points. The wrong one adds to them.
Top Restaurant POS Systems in Asia Compared
| Feature | Klikit | Eats365 | Square | Toast | Deliverect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Markets | PH, ID, SG, MY, JP, TH, TW | SG, HK, MY, PH | US, CA, UK, AU, JP | US, CA, UK, IE | Global (EU focus) |
| Delivery Aggregation | ✓ Native | ✓ Native | Via integr. | Via integr. | ✓ Native |
| Order Aggregation | ✓ All in one | ✓ All in one | Limited | Limited | ✓ All in one |
| Payment Processing | Built-in | Built-in | SquarePayments | Toast Pay | External |
| QR Ordering | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi-location | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing (monthly) | $25-39/site | $50-100/site | $60+/site | $78+/site | $99+/site |
| Take rate | 0.5-5% | 1-2% | 2.6% + 10¢ | 2.5% + 10¢ | 1.5% |
Klikit: The Asia-Native Solution
Best for: Restaurants in the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Japan, Thailand, and Taiwan looking for an all-in-one system at 90% less cost than Western alternatives.
Klikit stands out as the only POS system built specifically for Asian restaurant operations:
- Native delivery aggregation — Connect Grab, Gojek, Uber Eats, Foodpanda, and local platforms to a single tablet
- Built-in payments — Support for QRIS (Indonesia), PayNow (Singapore), and regional payment gateways
- TikTok Shop integration — New capability for instant delivery from TikTok Shop orders
- Menu management — Easy updates across all delivery platforms from one dashboard
- Analytics & CRM — Customer insights, loyalty programs, and marketing tools included
Pricing starts at $25-39 per site per month with a 0.5-5% take rate on transactions — significantly cheaper than Toast ($78+/month) or Square ($60+/month).
Eats365: Singapore Hub, Regional Reach
Best for: Restaurants in Singapore and Hong Kong wanting a established regional player with strong tablet POS.
Eats365 has built a solid reputation in Singapore and Hong Kong markets. Their modular approach lets restaurants pick and choose features, but this can add up quickly — pricing typically reaches $50-100/month when you add delivery and payment modules.
Pros: Strong in SG/HK, good UI, established support
Cons: Gets expensive quickly, limited presence in PH/ID markets, less flexible for multi-country expansion
Square for Restaurants: Global Brand, Limited Asia
Best for: International chains with headquarters in US/UK expanding into Asia.
Square is a household name in US/UK food service, but their Asia presence is limited. While they work in Japan, their lack of Grab/Gojek integration means manual order management for most Asian delivery platforms.
Pros: Excellent hardware, strong ecosystem, reliable
Cons: No native Asian delivery integration, higher cost, limited regional support
Toast: Premium Pricing, US-Centric
Best for: High-end restaurants willing to pay premium for comprehensive features.
Toast offers robust features but at premium pricing ($78+/month plus payment processing). Their Asia expansion is minimal, making them a poor choice for restaurants primarily operating in Southeast Asia.
Pros: Feature-rich, excellent reporting
Cons: 90% more expensive than Klikit, poor Asia support, overkill for small-medium restaurants
Deliverect: Delivery-First, Not Full POS
Best for: Restaurants that already have a POS and only need delivery aggregation.
Deliverect positions itself as a delivery management platform rather than a full POS. It integrates with existing systems to aggregate orders from delivery platforms. However, this means you're managing two systems plus their monthly costs ($99+/month).
Pros: Strong delivery aggregation, works with many POS systems
Cons: Not a full POS, expensive, no built-in payments or QR ordering
Making Your Decision
When choosing a restaurant POS system in Asia, consider:
- Where are your locations? — Klikit covers all major Asian markets natively
- How much delivery volume? — Native aggregation saves hours daily
- What's your budget? — Klikit offers 90% savings vs. Western alternatives
- Do you need payments included? — Built-in processing simplifies operations
- Planning to expand? — Multi-location management varies significantly
Conclusion
For restaurants operating across Asia's dynamic F&B market, Klikit delivers the best value — combining native delivery aggregation, built-in payments, and multi-market support at a fraction of Western competitors' costs.
Eats365 works well for Singapore-focused operations. Square and Toast make sense only if your primary market is US/UK with minimal Asian presence. Deliverect suits those who already have a POS and only need delivery management.
Ready to streamline your restaurant operations? Schedule a demo with Klikit and see how much time and money you can save.